Planning and Housing Committee

Minutes

Meeting #:
54
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Andrew S. Haydon Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West, and by electronic participation
Present:
  • Chair: Councillor Jeff Leiper, 
  • Vice-chair: Councillor Glen Gower, 
  • Councillor Riley Brockington, 
  • Councillor Cathy Curry, 
  • Councillor Laura Dudas, 
  • Councillor Laine Johnson, 
  • Councillor Theresa Kavanagh, 
  • Councillor Clarke Kelly, 
  • Councillor Catherine Kitts, 
  • Councillor Wilson Lo, 
  • Councillor Tim Tierney, 
  • and Councillor Ariel Troster 

Notices and meeting information are attached to the agenda and minutes, including: availability of simultaneous interpretation and accessibility accommodations; in camera meeting procedures; information items not subject to discussion; personal information disclaimer for correspondents and public speakers; notices regarding minutes; and remote participation details.


Accessible formats and communication supports are available, upon request.


Except where otherwise indicated, reports requiring Council consideration will be presented to Council on Wednesday, October 8, 2025, in Planning and Housing Committee Report 54.


The deadline to register by phone to speak, or submit written comments or visual presentations is 4 pm on Monday, September 29, 2025, and the deadline to register by email to speak is 8:30 am on Wednesday, October 1, 2025.

This is a public meeting to consider the proposed Comprehensive Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments listed as Item(s) 4.3 and 4.4 on today’s Agenda.

For the item just mentioned, only those specifically identified in the Planning Act who make oral submissions today or written submissions before the amendments are adopted may appeal the matter to the Ontario Land Tribunal. In addition, the applicant may appeal the matter to the Ontario Land Tribunal if Council does not adopt an amendment within 90 days of receipt of the application for a Zoning By-law Amendment and 120 days for an Official Plan Amendment.

To submit written comments on these amendments, prior to their consideration by City Council on October 8, 2025, please email or call the Committee or Council Coordinator.

No Declarations of Interest were filed.

File No. ACS2025-PDB-PS-0024 – City-wide


The Committee considered items 4.1 and 4.2 concurrently.

Natalie Pulcine, Planner III, Maddie Harreman-Fernandes, Planner II and Eva Walrond, Planner II, Planning, Development and Building Services (PDBS) provided an overview of the report and answered questions from the Committee.  A copy of the slide presentation is filed with the Office of the City Clerk.

The following PDBS staff were also present and responded to questions:

  • Marcia Wallace, General Manager
  • Royce Fu, Manager, Policy Planning
  • Derrick Moodie, Director, Planning Services

Following discussion and questions of staff, the Committee received the report recommendations as presented.

  • Report Recommendation(s)

    That the Planning and Housing Committee and Council receive this report for information.

    Received

File No. ACS2025-PDB-PS-0056 – City-wide

Natalie Pulcine, Planner III, Maddie Harreman-Fernandes, Planner II and Eva Walrond, Planner II, Planning, Development and Building Services (PDBS) provided an overview of the report and answered questions from the Committee.  A copy of the slide presentation is filed with the Office of the City Clerk.

The following PDBS staff were also present and responded to questions:

  • Marcia Wallace, General Manager
  • Royce Fu, Manager, Policy Planning
  • Derrick Moodie, Director, Planning Services

Following discussion and questions of staff, the Committee received the report recommendations as presented.

  • Report Recommendation(s)

    That Planning and Housing Committee and Council receive this report for information.

    Received

File No. ACS2025-PDB-PSX-0023 – Beacon Hill Cyrville (11)

Kelly Livingstone, Planner III, Planning, Development and Building Services (PDBS) provided an overview of the report and answered questions from the Committee. A copy of the slide presentation is filed with the Office of the City Clerk.

The following staff were also present and responded to questions:

  • Stuart Huxley, City Solicitor
  • Derrick Moodie, Director, Policy Planning, PDBS

The Committee heard from the following delegation:

  1. Roxane Babinska expressed concerns related to density, traffic and shadow impacts and suggested that Cash in Lieu of Parkland be used related to improving Steele Park, noting it have a positive impact.
  2. Richard Haniff* echoed similar concerns as the previous speaker, touching on shadowing, tree placement, impacts of setbacks and consideration of rezoning to a reasonable development.

[    * Individuals / groups marked with an asterisk above either provided comments in writing or by e-mail; all submissions and presentations are held on file with the Office of the City Clerk. ]

The Applicant/Owner as represented by Tyler Yakichuk, Fotenn provided an overview of the Application and responded to questions from Committee.  A copy of the slide presentation is filed with the Office of the City Clerk.

The following written submissions were received by, and are filed with, the Office of the City Clerk, and distributed to Committee Members:

  • Email dated September 30, 2025 from Greg

Following discussion and questions of staff, the Committee carried the report recommendations as presented.

  • Report Recommendation(s)

    1. That Planning and Housing Committee recommend Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for 1137 and 1147 Ogilvie Road and 1111 Cummings Avenue, as shown in Document 1, to permit for two 30-storey mixed-use buildings, as detailed in Document 2 and Document 3.
    2. That Planning and Housing Committee approve the Consultation Details Section of this report be included as part of the ‘brief explanation’ in the Summary of Written and Oral Public Submissions, to be prepared by the Office of the City Clerk and submitted to Council in the report titled, “Summary of Oral and Written Public Submissions for Items Subject to the Planning Act ‘Explanation Requirements’ at the City Council Meeting of October 8, 2025, subject to submissions received between the publication of this report and the time of Council’s decision.
    Carried

File No. ACS2025-PDB-PSX-0038 – Bay (7)

Kimberley Baldwin, Planner III, Planning, Development and Building Services (PDBS) provided an overview of the report and answered questions from the Committee. A copy of the slide presentation is filed with the Office of the City Clerk.

The Applicant/Owner as represented by Tyler Yakichuk, Fotenn was present and responded to questions from Committee.

Following discussion and questions of staff and the applicant, the Committee carried the report recommendations as presented.

  • Report Recommendation(s)

    1. That Planning and Housing Committee recommend Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for 1299 Richmond Road, as shown in Document 1, to permit a high-rise mixed-use development with a maximum height of 30 storeys, as detailed in Documents 2 and 3.
    2. That Planning and Housing Committee approve the Consultation Details Section of this report be included as part of the ‘brief explanation’ in the Summary of Written and Oral Public Submissions, to be prepared by the Office of the City Clerk and submitted to Council in the report titled, “Summary of Oral and Written Public Submissions for Items Subject to the Planning Act ‘Explanation Requirements’ at the City Council Meeting of October 8, 2025,” subject to submissions received between the publication of this report and the time of Council’s decision.
    Carried

File No. ACS2025-PDB-PS-0062 – City-wide


This Item will be considered by Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee on October 2, 2025.

  • Report Recommendation(s)

    That Planning and Housing Committee recommend Council: 

    1. Approve the On-site Signs Procedure for Development Application, attached as Document 1; and
    2. Delegate Authority to the Director, Planning Services, to update and amend the procedure as required.
    Carried

There were no in camera items.

  • Moved byT. Kavanagh

    WHEREAS the Mid-2023 Greenfield Residential Land Survey, received at the Planning and Housing Committee on February 5th, 2025, states: “Staff estimate that this provides for a 24-year supply, exceeding the 15-year supply requirement of the PPS, and is more than sufficient to meet any potential increases in greenfield demand until the next Official Plan update, particularly when less greenfield development occurred than projected in the past 5-years”, and;

    WHEREAS according to the same report: “The intensification rate for this 5-year period represents 59 per cent whereas the Official Plan targeted a minimum of 42 per cent”, and;

    WHEREAS the city has acknowledged that it is in a financial crisis, and;

    WHEREAS the city has raised taxes and introduced service efficiencies as a result of this crisis, and;

    WHEREAS the City currently has a $3.8 billion deficit in maintenance and replacement of recreational and other buildings, and;

    WHEREAS in September 2024, city council unanimously endorsed the “Fairness for Ottawa” campaign started by the mayor, aimed at getting more provincial and federal help to cope with financial pressures, and;

    WHEREAS the Infrastructure Master Plan estimates the cost of providing water and wastewater services to the Tewin Community at approximately $591 million, and;

    WHEREAS these costs do not include other necessary capital expenditures, such as transportation infrastructure and other city services, and;

    WHEREAS these costs also do not include associated maintenance, operational, and lifecycle costs that will be incurred over the lifetime of this infrastructure, and;

    WHEREAS the Province unilaterally expanded Ottawa’s urban boundary in 2022, overriding the City’s Official Plan, and;

    WHEREAS the Auditor General of Ontario and Integrity Commissioner raised concerns about improper developer influence in provincial land-use decisions, and;

    WHEREAS public opposition and environmental concerns prompted the Province to reverse these expansions in 2023, restoring municipal planning authority, and;

    WHEREAS staff noted in the New Official Plan – Growth Management Strategy Report (Document 3) that: "This vast area [the Tewin Community] is not contiguous to existing economic clusters, so it would not have immediate synergistic relationships with the existing economic base of the City", and;

    WHEREAS staff advised in the same report that due to the presence of sensitive marine clays, the Tewin Community will likely face grade-raising restrictions, meaning that all housing would rely permanently on sump pumps for foundation drainage, and;

    WHEREAS during the urban boundary expansion discussions, staff did not previously consider the Tewin lands due to their distance from existing and planned rapid transit lines, and therefore never evaluated the Tewin area using the criteria adopted by Council, including the "Five Big Moves", and;

    WHEREAS the decision to add the Tewin Lands to Ottawa’s urban boundary was a decision made by council via amending motion at committee, and; 

    WHEREAS this precluded a public consultation process, including consultation with relevant Indigenous groups, and;

    WHEREAS the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2020 provides guidelines for municipalities and planning authorities to consult all relevant Indigenous communities whose rights, interests, or territories might be affected by planning and development decisions, and;

    WHEREAS the City of Ottawa requires consultation with Indigenous groups during the policy planning and development approval processes, and;

    WHEREAS the Official Plan, Reconciliation Action Plan, and other municipal policies mandate that consultation is required when policies, plans, or developments may affect Indigenous rights, interests, or lands, and this applies to all relevant Indigenous communities, and;

    WHEREAS the City of Ottawa did not appear to satisfy its duty to consult and accommodate under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, with the First Nations of the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation Tribal Council regarding the urban boundary expansion, and;

    WHEREAS the City’s partner in Tewin, the Algonquins of Ontario, is not a First Nation recognized by the Federal Government under the Indian Act, but to quote the Ontario Superior Court  “is an unincorporated entity which was created to negotiate with the governments of Ontario and Canada in the Algonquin-Ontario negotiations”, and;

    WHEREAS the City faces the serious risk of litigation and liability from the First Nations of the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation Tribal Council if it proceeds with the Tewin development, given that the City should be aware that it mistakenly consulted and accommodated the unincorporated association of the Algonquins of Ontario rather than the rights-holding First Nations of the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation Tribal Council;

    WHEREAS Grand Chief Savanna McGregor of the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation Tribal Council has expressed opposition to the Tewin development, stating: "We want to make it abundantly clear that just because a landowner whose realty corporation is partly owned by one Algonquin First Nation and self-identified Algonquin people, does not qualify it as an act of reconciliation with the Algonquin Anishinabe Nation";

    THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that staff in the Policy Planning Branch of the Planning, Development and Building Department be directed to initiate an Official Plan Amendment to delete the Category 2 - Future Neighbourhood Overlay - New Tewin Community lands from Schedule C17 to the Official Plan of the City of Ottawa, and;

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Official Plan Amendment also contain the necessary provisions to delete provisions elsewhere in the Official Plan that reference the Tewin Community as Category 2 lands, and;

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Official Plan Amendment process initiated as a result of this motion include all the necessary process and public consultation to permit the amendment to be adopted by City Council, and;

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Planning staff provide their recommendation through the amendment and accompanying report as to how the residential and non-residential development that will no longer be in the proposed Tewin development can be provided for in the Official Plan, and;

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public meeting for the consideration of the Official Plan Amendment be scheduled no later than the first quarter of 2026, and;

    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Planning staff be directed to explore how land use planning could contribute to meaningful reconciliation in consultation with the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation Tribal Council.

Submitted by Councillor T. Tierney

With the Draft zoning bylaw released on September 8th 2025 and going to Joint Planning & Housing Committee and Agriculture & Rural Affairs Committee on December 17, 2025.  

With the elimination of R1 under the new provincial bill across the province I received expressed concerns about estate sized lots and Rothwell:

What is the maximum height with the N2 Designation?

Can subdivisions be put on lots?

Can municipally elected officials or councils in the province override the provincial Bill?

There was no other business.

Next Meeting


October 15, 2025.

The meeting adjourned at 11:11 am.