Central Library
Development
Danielle McDonald, CEO, provided
a presentation on the Central Library Development initiative (Held on file
with the Chief Executive Officer).The CEO advised that the Central
Library Development was approved as a strategic initiative in the 2015-2018
Term of Council Priorities on July 8th, making the Central Library
a project. She noted that the initiative was approved without any funding
attached and at this point, there is no approved site, no budget, nor
delivery method. This is a very complex, non-traditional project that will
involve the efforts of OPL and City staff, who will determine and recommend
the best approach and the most affordable way in which to deliver the project
to the Board and Council (i.e. partnership opportunities). Ms. McDonald
stated the Board endorsed a three-stage procurement process in order to
assist in refining the business opportunity and limit risk going forward:
Request for Expression of Interest (REOI), Request for Qualifications (RFQ),
and Request for Proposals (RFP). The CEO advised they are in the Project
Planning Phase that will run until Q1 2017, and the key components of the
phase include: project management, stakeholder engagement, procurement,
exemplar site analysis (on the public sector comparator site), design, and financial
analysis. The key deliverables are: Complete an REOI process and stakeholder
engagement, and use information gathered to inform the development of an RFQ;
development and approval of a RFQ; and, development and issuance of a RFP.
She said that the project implementation phase is estimated is to run from Q1
2017 – Q4 2020 (dependent on project delivery method). Ms. McDonald provided
a summary of the planning updates.
Chair Tierney thanked Ms. McDonald
and said that the CEO and staff have been busy working throughout the summer
to ensure that the file moves forward. He noted that the survey and the REOI
will be the most important starting points, and that the Board is looking
forward to continued progress and updates.
In response to a question from
Trustee Wilkinson with respect to the omission of “site selection process”
noted in the slide, Chair Tierney responded that the site decision has yet to
come before the Board. Ms. McDonald, CEO indicated that work has progressed
from Council’s decision on July 8th and the next key activities
are the stakeholder engagement and the REOI process. Elaine Condos, Division
Manager, Central Library Project added that until the project delivery method
is determined, a location for the library is unknown at this stage. She noted
that staff will be undertaking additional analysis on the exemplar site for
the public sector comparator. Chair Tierney noted that staff will take the
site selection analysis point from Trustee Wilkinson back for consideration.
Trustee McKenney reiterated that
there has to be a process for site selection. She mentioned that stakeholder
engagement on site design is going to inform the RFP process but she would
like to see that broadened to another public open house in order to hear from
as many people as possible. Ms. McDonald advised that a public open house is
not part of the current plan. She recommended that staff continue with the
engagement as outlined, review findings, and come back to the Board before
making modifications. Chair Tierney advised that staff will look at the
recommendations/suggestions and report back to the Board.
Trustee Fisher asked what kind of
information will be gathered from the REOI and how will the information
inform the RFQ process. Ms McDonald advised that the document provides a
series of detailed questions on site, design, and engagement, that will be compiled,
in addition to what will come out of the confidential meetings that will take
place. Jeff Byrne, Chief Procurement Officer, Supply Branch added that the REOI
gives the private sector some indication as to what they would be competing
for, and will provide the OPL/City with information on whether potential
partners would bring money to the project.
In response to a question from
Trustee Begg on whether the results of the REOI would be confidential, Ms.
McDonald noted that the results themselves would be confidential but staff
will take the information to help shape where to go with the process. The Board
will receive information on how many meetings took place and whether there
were various partnership opportunities, however, not providing specific
details. Further, Mr. Byrne said they would report in general terms but not
identify confidential information.
In response to a question from
Trustee Wilkinson on the Board having the REOI document, Mr. Byrne advised
that he would provide that document to the Trustees. He added that the REOI
is an information gathering exercise.
The Board heard from the following
delegations:
Mike Pyndus,* spoke of analysis of space
requirements and space criteria. He asked whether a business case will be
prepared with respect tax dollars and provided options that should be
considered in the development.
Sarah Anson-Cartwright, Bookmark the Core,
Citizens for a new Central Library in Downtown Ottawa* Bookmark the Core
recommended that: the outcomes of the steps be verified, the questions be
tabled to inquire how the three steps come together and inform on how they
will be incorporated into one another, encourage the library to issue a
plain-language fact sheet, and the OPL host a public face-to-face event for
optimal engagement and feedback.
[ *Individuals / groups marked
with an asterisk above either provided comments in writing or by email; all
submissions are held on file with the CEO.]
In addition to that
provided by the individuals marked with an asterisk above, written
correspondence was also submitted by the following, as noted:
·
Stephen
Thirlwall, a resident of Centretown*, expressed concerns about the location
being a place holder for the new Central library and noted that it is one of
the most awkward places to walk or bike.
There being no further
discussion, the CEO’s update was received as presented.
|