WHEREAS the city has budgeted $437.7 million for the Lansdowne Park redevelopment project (Lansdowne 2.0), with $331.3 million being new city debt; and
WHEREAS the Office of the Auditor General for Ottawa has cautioned that these projected costs are likely to be significantly underestimated; and
WHEREAS the existing north side stands and Civic Centre stadium underneath are safe, secure, highly valuable and are expected to last for decades to come with regular maintenance; and
WHEREAS the Ernst & Young financial due diligence report has shown that the City’s operations at Lansdowne Park are financially sustainable with a return to positive cashflow in the short term without demolition and Lansdowne 2.0; and
WHEREAS Ottawa City Council endorsed the Mayor’s “Fairness for Ottawa” campaign on the basis that the City is facing significant financial hurdles; and
WHEREAS not proceeding with Lansdowne 2.0 would result in significant savings for the city of Ottawa; and
WHEREAS thousands of Ottawa residents have indicated concerns with and outright opposition to the current Lansdowne 2.0 proposal through petitions, surveys, and public discussion; and
WHEREAS City Council is expected to consider final approval of the next phase of Lansdowne 2.0 in Q4 2025; and
WHEREAS including a question regarding Lansdowne 2.0 on the ballot in the 2026 Municipal Elections would clarify whether Council has the support of electors to proceed with this project; and
WHEREAS Subsection 8(1)(b) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 (MEA) provides that Council may pass a by-law to submit to its electors “a question not otherwise authorized by law but within the council’s jurisdiction”; and
WHEREAS Section 8.2 of the MEA provides that the results of such a question are binding on the municipality if at least 50 per cent of the eligible electors in the municipality vote on the question, and more than 50 per cent of the votes on the question are in favour of those results (referenced in the legislation as a “special majority”); and
WHEREAS the MEA sets out the process for Council to pass a by-law to submit a question to electors, which includes the following legislative provisions:
- The by-law must be passed on or before March 1 in the year of a regular election at which it is intended to submit the question to the electors (i.e., the by-law must be passed by March 1, 2026, to include a question on the ballot in the 2026 Municipal Elections) [Subsection 8.1(1)(a)],
- The question must “concern a matter within the jurisdiction of the municipality” (but “shall not concern a matter which has been prescribed by the Minister as a matter of provincial interest”), and must also be “clear, concise and neutral,” and “capable of being answered in the affirmative or the negative and the only permitted answers to the question are ‘yes’ and ‘no’” [Subsection 8.1(2)],
- The clerk must give at least 10 days notice of the intention to pass the by-law to the public and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, and hold at least one public meeting to consider the matter [Subsection 8.1(3)], and
- The notice of the intention to pass the by-law must include:
- The wording of the question,
- A clear, concise and neutral description of the consequences of the question if it is approved and the consequences if it is rejected with the special majority under Section 8.2, including an estimate of the costs, if any, that the municipality may incur in implementing the results of the question, and
- A description of the right to appeal under the legislation, including the last day for filing a notice of appeal [Subsection 8.1(5)]; and
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk be directed to bring forward an information report to the Finance and Corporate Services Committee and City Council regarding a proposed approach and timeline that would provide for Council to pass a by-law to submit a question regarding the next phase of the Lansdowne Park redevelopment (Lansdowne 2.0) to the electors in the 2026 Municipal Elections, as described in this motion; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the report be brought forward to Committee and Council at the same meeting as the staff report on Lansdowne 2.0 so Council may consider the information report and whether to submit a question to electors prior to final consideration of Lansdowne 2.0.