SPECIAL OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA 34
Wednesday, May 27, 2020
10:00
am
By Electronic Participation
This meeting will be
held through electronic participation in accordance with the Municipal Act,
2001, as amended by Bill 187, the Municipal Emergency Act, 2020, and
an Order in Council of March 28, 2020, which amended the Emergency
Management and Civil Protection Act and prohibits organized public events
of more than five people.
|
Other Communications Received:
|
|
|
·
|
Submission received containing the names of 3720 individuals
requesting that Ottawa City Council not approve the expansion of the urban
boundary (see Planning Committee and Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee
Joint Report 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Councillors D. Deans (See Motion No. 20/1 of September 25, 2019)
and
R. Chiarelli advised they would be absent from the City Council meeting of 27
May 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
That Council receive this report for information.
|
COMMITTEE MEETING INFORMATION
Delegations:
The committee heard 93 delegations on this item
Debate:
The committee spent 27 hours and 10 minutes on this item
Vote:
The committee CARRIED the report recommendations with multiple amendments and
directions to staff, on a division of 10 YEAS to 1 NAY
Position
of Ward Councillor: City-wide
Position
of Advisory Committee: N/A
PLANNING COMMITTEE AND AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS,
AS AMENDED
That Council:
1.
approve the Balanced Scenario as the
Residential Growth Management Strategy for the new Official Plan as described
in Document 1 attached, which accommodates 51 per cent overall of residential
growth through intensification, with an intensification target that increases
to 60 per cent in the 2041 to 2046 period;
2.
approve the inclusion of new urban
residential and employment land expansion of between 1,350-1,650 gross
hectares, which is to be selected using the criteria identified in Document 6
for residential land, and for employment land on the basis of strategic
additions to the urban employment lands base, with the final amount and
location of new urban residential and urban employment land to be brought
forward when the draft Official Plan is tabled in Q4 2020;
3.
approve the following corrections be
made the main report -
A.
replace Figure 4, page 24, so that the
Built-up Area Units, Greenfield %, and Greenfield Units columns accurately
reflect the intended intensification rate target scenario for each of the rows
from 2018-2021 to 2041-2046:
replace
|
Timeframe
|
Urban Units
|
Intensification %
|
Built-up Area Units
|
Greenfield %
|
Greenfield Units
|
|
2018-2021
|
24,300
|
40%
|
12,100
|
50%
|
12,100
|
|
2021-2026
|
38,800
|
47%
|
19,800
|
49%
|
19,000
|
|
2026-2031
|
35,800
|
56%
|
19,400
|
46%
|
16,500
|
|
2031-2036
|
31,200
|
68%
|
19,300
|
38%
|
11,800
|
|
2036-2041
|
27,400
|
80%
|
20,500
|
25%
|
6,800
|
|
2041-2046
|
24,300
|
100%
|
24,300
|
0%
|
-
|
|
2018-2046
|
181,800
|
64%
|
115,500
|
36%
|
66,300
|
with
|
Timeframe
|
Urban Units
|
Intensification %
|
Built-up
Area Units
|
Greenfield
%
|
Greenfield
Units
|
|
2018-2021
|
24,300
|
40%
|
9,700
|
60%
|
14,600
|
|
2021-2026
|
38,800
|
47%
|
18,200
|
53%
|
20,600
|
|
2026-2031
|
35,800
|
56%
|
20,100
|
44%
|
15,800
|
|
2031-2036
|
31,200
|
68%
|
21,200
|
32%
|
10,000
|
|
2036-2041
|
27,400
|
80%
|
21,900
|
20%
|
5,500
|
|
2041-2046
|
24,300
|
100%
|
24,300
|
0%
|
-
|
|
2018-2046
|
181,800
|
64%
|
115,500
|
36%
|
66,300
|
B.
amend the following references to add
- “ and an additional exception for the Village of Manotick only with respect
to the lands within the Village which run along the
western shore of the Rideau River.”
i.
Page 37 - under d.
Conflicting Rural Use Factors:
Land
within one kilometre of a Village will not be considered, except for the
village of Notre-Dame-des-Champs which is already almost fully surrounded by
the urban area.
ii.
Page 54 - under
RURAL IMPLICATIONS, first paragraph:
The City proposes, through the Urban Expansion Detailed
Evaluation Criteria, to maintain a 1-kilometre buffer around
existing Villages that are adjacent to the urban area so that they remain
distinct from the evolving suburban areas. The only exception will be for the
Village of Notre-Dame-des-Champs, which is already surrounded by existing and
proposed urban development and for which a buffer is not possible.
4.
approve that the following corrections
be made to the Supporting Document 1 -Residential Growth Management Strategy
for the New Official Plan:
A.
replace Figure 47, page 45 so that the
Balanced Scenario Built-up Area units of “14,600” shows “82,400”:
replace
|
Timeframe
|
Urban Units
|
Intensification %
|
Built-up Area Units
|
Greenfield %
|
Greenfield Units
|
|
2021-2026
|
38,800
|
40%
|
15,500
|
60%
|
23,300
|
|
2026-2031
|
35,800
|
40%
|
14,300
|
60%
|
21,500
|
|
2031-2036
|
31,200
|
40%
|
12,500
|
60%
|
18,700
|
|
15-year total
|
105,800
|
40%
|
42,300
|
60%
|
63,500
|
|
Balanced scenario
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
75,100
|
|
Post-2036 surplus
|
|
|
|
|
11,700
|
with
|
Timeframe
|
Urban Units
|
Intensification %
|
Built-up Area Units
|
Greenfield %
|
Greenfield Units
|
|
2021-2026
|
38,800
|
40%
|
15,500
|
60%
|
23,300
|
|
2026-2031
|
35,800
|
40%
|
14,300
|
60%
|
21,500
|
|
2031-2036
|
31,200
|
40%
|
12,500
|
60%
|
18,700
|
|
15-year total
|
105,800
|
40%
|
42,300
|
60%
|
63,500
|
|
Balanced scenario
|
|
|
82,400
|
|
75,100
|
|
Post-2036 surplus
|
|
|
|
|
11,700
|
B.
on page 45, Methodology Gross
Developable Area, first sentence, replace “995” with “1,281”, to read as
follows: “The Balanced scenario requires a portion of projected growth to occur
on 1,281 hectares of urban area expansion lands.”
C.
amend the following references to add
– “ and an additional exception for the Village of Manotick only with respect
to the lands within the Village which run along the western shore of the Rideau
River.”
i.
Page 7 - under
Urban: Expansion Area last bullet
Land
within 1km from an existing Village (except Notre-Dames-des-Champs, which is
already predominately surrounded).
ii.
Page 48 – second
paragraph last bullet
Land
within one kilometre of an existing Village (except Notre-Dame-des-Champs).
iii.
Page 50 - under
Conflicting Rural Use Factors
Generally, land within one kilometre of a village will not
be considered unless the village is already partially surrounded by the urban
area, for example Notre Dame-des-Champs.
5.
approve that:
A.
Criteria 6
“Availability of Rapid Transit” be renamed “Availability of Rapid Transit or
Transit Priority - Isolated Measures”, and that points be included in Criteria
6 as follows:
a.
6 points for “Within
the proximity of an existing Transit Priority Corridor - Isolated Measures”
b.
2 points for
“Within the proximity of a future Transit Priority Corridor - Isolated Measures”
B.
Criteria 7 “Proximity to Nearest Rapid
Transit Station” be renamed “Proximity to Nearest Rapid Transit Station,
Transit Priority Corridor – Isolated Measures or Park and Ride Feeding the
Rapid Transit System”, and that points be included in Criteria 7 as follows:
a.
for locations within 1.9 km of a Park
and Ride feeding a Rapid Transit System and Transit Priority – Isolated
Measures, 2 points maximum
C.
Document 1 and 6 are to be revised
where applicable to reflect these changes
6.
approve the following additional
exclusions to lands, parcels and clusters of parcels that are to be considered
for candidates for inclusion into any proposed urban or village boundary
expansion:
a. lands
in an Agricultural Resource Area are to be excluded from any and all consideration
as candidate parcels for inclusion in the urban or village boundary
b. lands
in an Agricultural Resource Area are not to be evaluated, considered or ranked
in any way that would allow lands to be even remotely associated or considered
for inclusion in expanded urban or village settlement areas
7.
direct staff to adjust the scoring
criteria to account for the impacts to existing agricultural and livestock
operations and the Minimum Distance Separation;
8.
approve that
Agricultural Resource Area lands are not to be used for urban infrastructure
such as storm ponds, water and wastewater infrastructure, sports fields or
other uses that support the development of new suburban communities;
9.
approve that, to
recognize and protect the importance of mineral aggregate production (as
defined in the Official Plan as ‘Bedrock Resource and Sand and Gravel Resource
Areas’) for Ottawa’s construction and infrastructure needs that staff be
directed not to score, evaluate, consider or rank in any way residential
candidate parcels adjacent to or within 200 metres of Bedrock Resource and 200
metres of Sand and Gravel Resource Areas as identified on Schedule A and B of
the Official Plan, unless the landowner can
provide evidence by a qualified subject matter expert that the resource will be
exhausted by 2036;
10.
approve that staff be directed to, when the official plan is presented in Q4
2020, include in their report (on a conceptual basis) the tool kit that will
help the City reach its intensification goals. For clarity, the report is not
expected to present the details but general trends such as new R4 zones on
arterial roadways, permit semi-detached in R1 zones as some potential examples;
11.
approve that any rural parcels that
are beyond the catchment area of an already-planned transit station will need
Council confirmation of a funding source or mechanism for any necessary transit
network extensions, and any other component of required municipal
infrastructure, prior to the approval of its implementing
secondary plan;
12.
approve that staff in Planning,
Infrastructure and Economic Development will further consider and detail the
requirements of secondary plans for greenfield development as part of the new
draft Official Plan to be tabled by the end of 2020;
13.
approve that the draft Official Plan
policies should be coordinated with the City’s Refresh of the 10 Year Housing
and Homelessness Plan and assess implementation and enabling strategies such
as:
a.
updated definitions of affordability
including an analysis of the geographic differences of affordability within the
City; and
b.
the role of Inclusionary Zoning in
providing affordable housing; and
c.
providing enabling policies that
support the 10 Year and Homelessness Plan in areas of land use, infrastructure,
transportation, and the City’s use of its own assets and real estate;
14.
approve that staff:
A.
bring forward policies in the draft Official
Plan to ensure that any urban expansion areas are being planned, funded, phased
and built so that the necessary infrastructure and community amenities are in
place and coordinated with the development approvals process;
B.
establish clear guidelines for
developers to notify residents who have purchased a home or land within the
development of all infrastructure and amenities which will be required to be
constructed or upgraded as a condition of application approval, and timelines
be made publicly available to increase accountability and transparency of the
application process;
15.
approve that, in order to encourage
and support development at our transit stations and along the transit corridor,
staff be directed to advise the
appropriate Standing Committee(s) and Council how complex it would be to change
current City land disposal polices to create a competitive process for
City-owned lands and air rights at rapid transit stations and along the rapid transit
network that would offer City owned land at nominal costs in exchange for
tangible public benefits (such as long term affordable rental housing) that
equals or exceeds the value of the lands or air rights;
16.
approve that:
A.
in addition to the numerical criteria
recommended in Document 6 that Committee recommend that Council approve the
following additional evaluation lens:
“That all candidate parcels lands
shall be reviewed primarily against the policy directions contained in the
Council approved OP policy directions known as the “Five Big Moves” and the
numeric criteria. That evaluation will demonstrate how the future development
of the lands would advance the policy directions contained therein”.
B.
the Criteria Section of the Staff
report Page 38 Section e. Scoring and selecting land be amended by the following:
After the sentence “The first
evaluation will likely identify lands that readily complete existing
communities in a logical and efficient manner.” Add the following:
“However, many of the growth
communities outside the greenbelt are largely complete within the current urban
boundary. Where additional expansion lands are recommended, it should be
demonstrated, that development of these new lands can be accommodated by
existing and planned community amenities.
As Agricultural Resource Area lands
will not be considered for inclusion for urban or village expansions, that
staff compile the complete list of all candidate parcels required to satisfy
the 2046 urban expansion land requirements (comprising extensions to existing
communities and other General Rural Area lands to establish a new
community(ies), consistent with Section 2.2.1.4 of the approved Official
Plan).
Further, that the
complete list of recommend candidate properties be presented to Committee and
Council for approval.”
COMMITTEE MEETING INFORMATION
Delegations: The committee heard nine delegations on this item
Debate: The committee spent 1 hour and 50 minutes on this item
Vote: The committee Carried the report recommendations with an
amendment to Document 2
Position of Ward Councillor: Councillor Kavanagh is opposed to the
report recommendation. Her comments are noted in the report.
Position of Advisory Committee: n/a
|
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS, AS
AMENDED
That Council approve:
1. an amendment to Zoning
By-law 2008-250 for 841, 845, and 855(A) Grenon Avenue to permit a
four-storey apartment building, as detailed in Document 2, as amended by
the following:
a. that Document 2 be
replaced with the following: “The proposed change to the City of Ottawa
Zoning By-law No. 2008-250 for 841, 845, and 855(A) Grenon Avenue: 1. Rezone
the lands as shown in Document 1 from R1O and R3A to R4M”; and
|
|
2. that pursuant to the Planning
Act, subsection 34(17), no further notice be given.
|
|
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS, AS
AMENDED
That Council approve:
1. an amendment to Zoning
By-law 2008-250 for 1946 Scott Street to allow for the redesign of a
previously approved nine-storey apartment building, as detailed in Document
2, as amended by the following:
a. that the following
changes be made to 1. b) in Document 2:
i. delete the second
provision (hyphen);
ii. third provision: delete
“or 90 m, whichever is the lesser” and replace “storey below” with “sixth
storey” to read “at and above the ninth storey, the building must be setback
an additional 2 m from the rear wall of the sixth storey”;
iii. fourth provision: delete
“or 84 m, whichever is the lesser” to read “at and above the seventh storey,
a building must be setback a minimum of 400 mm from the front wall of the
principal building”;
iv. fifth provision: delete
“or 90 m, whichever is the lesser” and replace “storey below” with “sixth storey”
to read “at and above the ninth storey, the building must be setback 2 m from
the front wall of the sixth storey”;
v. seventh provision:
replace “2.45 m” by “2.3 m” to read “minimum soft landscaped area abutting
the rear lot line: 2.3 m”;
vi. ninth provision: replace
“2.45 m” by “2.3 m” to read “minimum soft landscaped buffer of a parking lot
abutting the rear lot line: 2.3 m”;
vii. twelfth provision:
replace “double traffic lane” by “two-direction controlled single traffic
lane” to read “minimum width of a two-direction controlled single traffic
lane driveway providing access to a parking lot or parking garage: 3 m”;
viii. add the provision:
“minimum width of an aisle providing access to parking spaces in a parking
lot or parking garage: 5.5m.”
|
|
2. that pursuant to the Planning
Act, subsection 34(17), no further notice be given.
|
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law
2008-250 for 341 and 343 Tweedsmuir Avenue to permit the reduction of select
zoning performance standards in order to convert an existing pair of
three-unit dwelling into four-unit low-rise apartment dwellings, as detailed
in Document 2.
|
|
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS, AS
AMENDED
That Council:
1. approve an amendment to
Zoning By-law 2008-250 for 5924 and 5938 Hazeldean Road to permit 76 stacked
townhouses and ten back-to-back townhouses, as detailed in Document 2;
|
|
2. direct staff to work with
the applicant to achieve the following ahead of subsequent site plan control
approval:
a) the applicant must provide
a letter of intent to secure off-site parking spaces to be made available to
condominium owners for overflow parking on such terms as the applicant may
determine;
b) the applicant must obtain
approval of the detailed design for traffic calming on Victor Street;
c) the applicant must provide
transit passes to all its residents for a period of one year; and d) the
applicant must include a clause in all purchase and sale agreements, and a
notice on title, advising purchasers that each unit only comes with 1.0
parking space.
|
|
3. approve that pursuant to
the Planning Act, subsection 34(17), no further notice be given.
|
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law
2008-250 for 134 and 136 Willow Street to permit the reduction of select
zoning performance standards in order to convert an existing pair of
three-unit dwellings into four-unit low-rise apartment dwellings, as detailed
in Document 2.
|
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law
2008-250 for 866 and 898 Eagleson Road; 1325, 1355 and 1365 Terry Fox Drive
to permit residential land uses and two new park blocks as detailed in
Document 2.
|
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law
2008-250 for 1158 Old Second Line Road to permit 47 two storey townhouse
dwellings on private streets, as detailed in Document 2.
|
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
That Council direct staff to bring forward an amendment
to the zoning by-law to reduce the parking requirements where automated technologies
would serve to reduce the number of parking spaces necessary for certain
warehouse and light industrial uses or components thereof.
|
MOTION
Moved by Mayor J. Watson
Seconded by Councillor T. Tierney
WHEREAS on March
11, 2020 the World Health Organization assessed COVID-19 as a global pandemic;
and
WHEREAS the Government of Ontario and the City
of Ottawa have each declared a State of Emergency as a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic under the Emergency Management and Civil
Protection Act, 1990; and
WHEREAS the COVID-19 pandemic presents the greatest
financial challenge that Canadian cities and communities have seen in generations
and many are on the brink of financial crisis as revenues are plummeting, costs
are rising, and municipalities cannot run deficits which puts them, and the essential
services they provide, further at risk; and
WHEREAS the financial impact to the City of Ottawa resulting from the
COVID-19 pandemic is currently estimated at a net loss of $66 million if the state
of emergency continues until June, $123 million if it continues until
September, and $186 if it continues until December (and this excludes financial
impacts to the Ottawa Police Service, Ottawa Public Health, and Ottawa Public
Library); and
WHEREAS on April 22, 2020 the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) formally requested
the federal government provide at least $10 billion in direct emergency operating
funding for Canadian municipalities; and
WHEREAS this request for federal emergency funding
included $7.6 billion in direct allocations (like the federal gas tax fund) for
all local governments, plus $2.4 billion for municipalities with transit
systems, as well as additional funding for municipalities facing extraordinary
challenges, such as those struggling to support vulnerable populations; and
WHEREAS in order to be effective nationwide, federal
funding must be straightforward, direct and flexible, which means a single
transfer that municipalities can use as needed, with no requirement for provinces
to match funds;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Ottawa unequivocally support
the position of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and join the Association
of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) and other Canadian
municipalities in lobbying the federal government regarding the urgent need for
direct emergency funding for local governments; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Ottawa, in coalition with
the Large Urban Mayors' Caucus of Ontario (LUMCO), advocate with the provincial
government for immediate funding to address public transit revenue losses and
ensure the liquidity of Ontario municipalities, as well as to realign capital
and service delivery responsibilities with sustainable revenue streams, including
new revenue tools for municipalities; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Council request
that the Mayor, on behalf of the City of Ottawa, write a letter to the federal
government formally requesting they meet with Big City Mayors Caucus and the Large
Urban Mayors Caucus of Ontario, in order to determine the best way to help municipalities
fund current operations and maintain appropriate service levels during the COVID-19
crisis, and allow for service levels to be quickly re-established during the recovery
period.
MOTION
Moved by Councillor M. Fleury
Seconded by Councillor C. McKenney
WHEREAS drug use, overdoses and addictions
continue to be a problem in the City of Ottawa, with overdose emergency department
visits that have almost quadrupled and hospitalization rates that have more than
doubled between 2009 and 2019, with Fentanyl and analogues implicated in almost
73% of opioid related deaths;
WHEREAS, local drug checking data (2019) from
Sandy Hill’s CTS indicates that 96.7% of drugs bought as opioids and 42.2% of
drugs bought as stimulants contain illicit fentanyl, fentanyl analogues or other
synthetic opioids;
WHEREAS drug use, overdoses and addictions
continue to increase costs to governments (for services such as shelters,
healthcare, and emergency services);
WHEREAS addiction issues have also been destructive
to communities and their economic well-being due to rising crime and violence
associated with the drug trade;
WHEREAS Ottawa Inner City Health, as a community
health partner of the City of Ottawa, aims to improve the health and access to
health care for people who are chronically homeless and integrate health care
services so that homeless individuals can receive the same quality of health
care as other Canadians;
WHEREAS since August 2017, Dr. Jeff Turnbull and
Ottawa Inner City Health successfully launched Canada’s first ever Managed
Opioid Program (MOP) in Ottawa providing controlled amounts of pharmaceutical-grade
narcotics (this prescription of narcotics is referred to as providing a “Safe
Supply”), housing, and other supports to 25 individuals, with positive impacts
and successes for individuals including stabilizing lives and decreasing crises
and decreasing petty crime in communities;
WHEREAS previous overdose rates of participants
in the pilot project averaged three times a week, and other people who use
drugs are pleading to be accepted into the program as a life-saving measure;
WHEREAS CTV Ottawa’s “In-Depth: “‘A City in Crisis’
Part 3”’ on April 3rd 2019 by Catherine Lathem, covered the positive impacts and
individual successes of this small scale pilot project and it’s positive
impacts on stabilizing the lives of those with addictions in Ottawa;
WHEREAS the COVID-19 pandemic has further demonstrated
the lack of supports for our City’s most vulnerable and has also highlighted
the vulnerabilities in communities where petty crimes and panhandling are main
sources of income to fuel addictions which are increasingly impacting small businesses
and residents;
WHEREAS offering a Safe Supply of drugs to users
will save lives and reduce the community impacts of addictions;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City of Ottawa take
action to expand the Safe Supply of drugs to the population in Ottawa that
meets the criteria for those most in need, by asking the Mayor to write to the
Provincial and Federal ministers of health asking them to implement and fund
the expansion of Safe Supply in Ottawa to provide immediate supports to people
who use drugs and decrease burdens on communities experiencing the impacts of
addiction.
MOTION
Moved
by Councillor J Leiper
Seconded by Councillor R.
Brockington
WHEREAS the Owner of the lands at 1960 Scott Street was party to
Section 37 Agreements with the City of Ottawa registered as Instrument No. OC1882453
and OC2141507 on April 21, 2017 and September 11, 2019 respectively; and
WHEREAS such Agreements, in part, directed $270,000 that has been provided
by the Owner, to a Ward 15 specific fund for affordable housing; and
WHEREAS the specific funds for affordable housing have not been
budgeted or allocated towards any projects at this time; and
WHEREAS it is at the request and direction of the Ward Councillor to
have $50,000 of the above funds redirected towards a budget for a future sidewalk
project on Elmgrove Avenue; and
WHEREAS there is a reasonable planning relationship between the
proposed development subject to the intent of the Section 37 Agreement and the
community benefit of a sidewalk on Elmgrove Avenue;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council approve the redistribution of the
existing funds in the following manner:
a) $50,000 be
directed from the existing Ward 15 specific fund for affordable housing towards
the Elmgrove Avenue sidewalk project.
|
|
|
Councillors S. Moffatt and L. Dudas
|
|
|
THREE READINGS
|
|
|
a)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at cour Stanhope Court on Plan 4M-1655,
as being exempt from Part Lot Control.
|
|
b)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 to change the zoning of the lands
known municipally as 1158 Old Second Line
Road.
|
|
c)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 to change the zoning of the lands
known municipally as 341 and 343 Tweedsmuir Avenue.
|
|
d)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 to change the zoning of the lands
known municipally as 841, 845 and 855A Grenon Avenue.
|
|
e)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 to change the zoning of the lands
known municipally as 866 and 898 Eagleson Road and 1325, 1355 and 1365 Terry
Fox Drive.
|
|
f)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 to change the zoning of the lands
known municipally as 134 and 136 Willow Street.
|
|
g)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 to change the zoning of the lands
known municipally as 1964 Scott Street.
|
|
h)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 to change the zoning of the lands
known municipally as 5924 and 5938 Hazeldean
Road
|
|
i)
A
by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at rue Grackle Street and rue Rallidale
Street on Plan 4M-1653,
as being exempt from Part Lot Control.
|
|
j)
A by-law of the
City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2003-499 respecting fire routes.
|
|
k)
A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending By-law
No. 50 of 2000 respecting the procurement of goods, services and construction
for the City of Ottawa.
|
|
|
|
|
Simultaneous
interpretation of these proceedings is available.
Accessible formats and communication supports are
available, upon request.
|
|
NOTICE
The City of Ottawa continues to take COVID-19 seriously, and in
following the advice of provincial and federal governments, is making significant
changes to services and programming to help protect health and wellbeing of
the community. City Hall is temporarily closed to help stop the spread of COVID-19.
In-person Committee and Council meetings have been cancelled. Such meetings,
as warranted, will be held electronically until further notice. For more information
about service disruptions, please visit our COVID-19 webpage: https://ottawa.ca/en/health-and-public-safety/covid-19-ottawa.
Members of the public may watch the Council meeting live on
RogersTV or the Ottawa City Council YouTube page. For more details and
updates visit https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/your-city-government/watch-or-listen-council-meetings
IN CAMERA ITEMS
In Camera Items are not
subject to public discussion or audience. Any person has a right to request an independent investigation of
the propriety of dealing with matters in a closed session. A form requesting
such a review may be obtained, without charge, from the City’s website or in
person from the Chair of this meeting. Requests are kept confidential pending
any report by the Meetings Investigator and are conducted without charge to
the Requestor.
|